This week our focus has been on cognitivism. In my response to our discussion board, the expression I used to describe the human brain is that of a "computer". However, I wonder if that is an accurate representation of the brain. A computer is a device that unless data is input is useless. Is that the brain?
I do not know that the mind is only shaped by the material that is provided by others, whether it be through visual instruction, textbooks, or even websites. I believe that our mind is also shaped by the experiences we go through on a daily basis. If this is the case, then the best learning theory to use would be behaviorism.
The following links, also blogs, provide additional input from others who have expressed their views on learning theories. Check out the following:
I truly wonder if Bill Kerr is accurate when he questions whether we have too many -isms involved in the learning theory (Kerr, 2007). Rather than using the theories together in a learning environment, are we too focused on using one model because it may dictate another. I believe it is important to touch base with all learning styles and not to focus on one model. Any thoughts?
Reference:
Kerr, B. (2007). _isms as filters, not blinkers. Retrieved June 30, 2010 from
I like the computer image, but fear that it's limited. We are inundated with stimuli, most filtered out yet somehow still captured. I suppose since the internet with its cookies, spyware, adware, etc. our computers are also inundated with information, but are they able to properly filter?
ReplyDeleteOn the topic of isms, I agree that we need to take the creme of the crop and apply appropriately.
Jodie,
ReplyDeleteYou make some interesting points about learning theories. I'm not sure what you mean though about learning styles. What would an example be of using learning styles and not learning theory? It's just not clear what you are saying about learning styles.
glenn shepherd